Abortion is Morally Wrong Essay -- Abortion Essays

Abortion is the ending of pregnancy before birth and is morally wrong. An abortion results in the death of an embryo or a fetus. Abortion destroys the lives of helpless, innocent children and is illegal in many countries. By aborting these unborn infants, humans are hurting themselves; they are not allowing themselves to meet these new identities and unique personalities. Abortion is very simply wrong. Everyone is raised knowing the difference between right and wrong. Murder is wrong, so why is not abortion? People argue that it is not murder if the child is unborn. Abortion is murder since the fetus being destroyed is living, breathing and moving. Why is it that if an infant is destroyed a month before the birth, there is no problem, but if killed a month after birth, this is inhumane murder? It is morally and strategically foolish, because we lose the middle when we talk about reproductive rights without reference to a larger moral and spiritual dimension, and we are unwilling to use language like transgression and redemption, or right and wrong. -Wolf p54 The main purpose abortions are immoral is how they are so viciously done. Everyday, innocent, harmless foetuses that could soon be laughing children are being brutally destroyed. One form of abortion is to cut the foetus into pieces with serrated forceps before being removed, piece by piece from the uterus by suction with a vacuum aspirator. Another form consists of bringing the foetus feet first into the birth canal, puncturing its skull with a sharp instrument and sucking out the brain tissue. The body parts, such as the head, are given letters, rather than refer to the parts as what they are. In my opinion this is for the doctors who cannot face the reality of what they are doing. The remains of the foetus or embryo, as the case may be, are put into everyday, plastic buckets and then sent to a dumpster where these precious bones and limbs are disposed. However, how and when an abortion takes place are matters of little importance to pro- abortionists and other defenders. Even former abortion practitioners from varying backgrounds and religions have a new view on abortion. These changes of heart were caused by psychological, religious and scientific reasons. One doctor, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, performed 60,000 abortions and supervised 10,000, before scientific evidence and the use of a... ...ou are going to loose.† (Wolf p54) WORKS CITED Alvare, Helen, Wilson, Marle, Wolf, Naomi. â€Å"Abortion: Whose Values? Whose Rights?† Tikkun January-February 1997: pp54-60 Clark, Thomas. â€Å"Thou Shalt Not Play God† The Humanist July-August 1995: p3 Hunt, George W.. â€Å"Of Many Things† America 31 January 1998: p2 Lavelle, Marianne. â€Å"When Abortion Comes Late In Pregnancy, Though Rare, Most Aren’t For Medical Reasons† U.S. News and World Reports 19 January 1998: p31-32 Lefevere, Patricia. â€Å"Ex-abortion Providers; Conversation Tales† National Catholic Reporter 16 January 1998: p6 Merril, Ted. â€Å"Abortion; Extreme Views Ignore Reality† Medical Economics 15 July 1996: p33 McMillan, Jeff. â€Å"Focusing On a Woman’s Right To Self Defense† The Chronicle of Higher Education. 6 December 1996: pA12 â€Å"No Easy Quick Fix Solutions To Abortion Issues† National Catholic Reporter 8 November 1996: p20 â€Å"Reproductive Tract Infections and Abortion Among Adolescent Girls In Rural Nigeria† The Lancet 4 February 1995: p300 Thomas, Judy. â€Å"Pro-life Turns Deadly† Newsweek 26 January 1998: p64 Wallace, Bruce. â€Å"When One Fetus Lives and One Dies† Maclean’s 19 August 1996: pp20-21